Teeworlds - development

@Assa as I can't answer in bridge

20:11

#include <iostream>

class CTest {
        int a;
        int b;
        int c;
        int d;
};

int main() {
        std::cout << "sizeof(CTest) : " << sizeof(CTest) << std::endl;
        std::cout << "sizeof(int) : " << sizeof(int) << std::endl;
        std::cout << "sizeof(CTest) / sizeof(int) : " << sizeof(CTest) / sizeof(int) << std::endl;
}

20:11

sizeof(CTest) : 16
sizeof(int) : 4
sizeof(CTest) / sizeof(int) : 4

20:12

CTest has its size equals to each member size (dunno how to say it in english)

20:12

4 ints, then CTest = 16 bytes

20:12

basically Num() gives the number of members in that class

i understood how it works, but it's still hackish

well it's cool

and also the type was wrong in the link

just not quite clear that part of the code

@ReiTW's example is fine and not fragile imo

20:13

that in teeworlds code looks bad to me, it uses int instead of char*

why should it be char *

20:14

the s_apNames is static

@Dune the Macro defines CTuneParam instances, which are integer warappers

isn't CTuningParams just static const char *s_apNames[];

20:14

no

20:14

it's defined in the macro

20:15

the static variable doesn't increase the size of the object

ahhh, it's static, nvm

20:15

right, then it's fine I guess

should still be sizeof (CTuneParam) and not int

20:16

If that datatype ever changes this code will break

Yes

pr it!

CTuneParam &operator = (int v) { m_Value = (int)(v*100.0f); return *this; } works too but v is already an integer

yes master

not super readable