Teeworlds - development

wasnt teeworlds meetup funny?

i had seen some pictures from it, somebody was drawing mapres, someone was coding, table full of food and a bbq at the end (edited)

who works during meetup

uh, it wasnt called as meetup

20:08

idk how was it called xd

20:09

and site with these pictures is gone

20:09

eh, need to use wayback machine

@TsFreddie the assert on group layer count is intentional. Obviously this is not something we want to keep in the editor in the future, we want to inform the user of the limit reached and cancel.

20:22

As for the others, if you're not sure open an issue or @ me

yeah. was wondering.

the editor is still very much work in progress

noted

20:23

read that wrong

20:23

but still noted

20:25

for the history thing. i was thinking having a mapui entry and a uionly entry

map UI?

Map + UI snapshot / UI only snapshot

I'm not sure I follow

20:31

could you elaborate?

like if you change something in the map. you take a snapshot of the map and the tools/layers right?

yes and those are separate

what if when user only changes tools/layer, we also take a snapshot of only UI changes.

yes and how do we determine what state to roll back to then?

it might be easier for me to wrote a code draft

or make a drawing on paint, those work too

20:44

how about this EeveeShy

20:45

also we can check if the last entry is a UI only entry. if it is, we update it with the current ui snapshot instead of adding a new entry. (edited)

so you want the user to be back at editing layer 2

pretty much

which is the UI state the user was at when the last map snapshot was created

20:49

right? User edits layer 2, it creates a snapshot entry

20:49

(map entry)

20:50

and let's say we do a bunch of edits after this one, when we go back to the layer 2 edit we want to be on layer 2

yes.

20:52

so to the map state of "MAP CHANGES ON LAYER 1" and the UI state of "SWITCH TO LAYER 2" if that make any sense (edited)

Ah so this is different

yeah, that explaination was pretty bad.

20:53

my bad

don't worry about it

~~well in that case maybe we don't even need to do seperate type of entries~~ (doesn't make any sense) (edited)

so you want a different behaviour than what we have right now

20:53

which would be, the user gets back at editing layer 2

yes. because when I switch to layer 2, made an edit and undo. i would expect to stay on layer 2

20:54

instead of whatever layer i changed last time

but this is what happens currently right?

20:55

we stay on layer 2?

i don't think so

ok let me have a look

20:56

ok you're right

1

I would also like the user to stay on the same layer indeed

20:56

I think this is what I intended

20:57

well, it is pretty hard to tell whether it was a bug or a decision.

currently when we create a map snapshot, we also make one of the UI (a basic one)

20:58

but that does not work too well

21:01

i think this makes more sense

when is the map snapshot created on your graph?

one sec