Teeworlds - development

@Dune Teeworlds for PS4??

14:27

is its possible

No idea

can someone do this please xd

14:33

@Dune just asking, should you do it ?

is it expensive ot publish stuff for PS4 ?

15:07

i like supporting multiple platforms but idk how one should control a tee with a controller xd

15:08

i would prefer mobile for chat and spec

PS4 are just midrange gaming computers

15:11

Never had a console though, cant know

there are some limitations to publish ps4 game

15:11

you need approved ps developer account

15:12

and devkit to launch dev builds

15:12

so difficult to make for community

PC will always be better than a console

15:29

You can upgrade a PC (you cant upgrade a ps, must buy newer one) and you can even play all PS titles there with a nearly perfect 99% emulation nowadays

well, you can't say a PC or a Console is better, both have their disadvantages. But there are youtube videos for that kind of discussion. But I agree, Teeworlds isn't made for controllers.

In CCharacter::TakeDamage, is there any way to tell if the character got hit by an explosion (and not by a projectile)? In both cases Weapon will be WEAPON_GRENADE... [https://github.com/teeworlds/teeworlds/blob/d18b5c3fec3b4c028b2c10af850206fdec6a1621/src/game/server/entities/character.cpp#L682]

teeworlds/teeworlds

A retro multiplayer shooter. Contribute to teeworlds/teeworlds development by creating an account on GitHub.

Probably not without some hack

@Slayer *gV* what do you need it for?

21:14

You can add a parameter to the TakeDamage function called bool Explosion, and set that to false by default and only add a true in CGameContext::CreateExplosion -> TakeDamage

@fokkonaut Modding. I don't want to alter too much of the vanilla code to avoid future merge conflicts.

Lol? Ofc its modding. Whenever your code differs from the vanilla code you have modded

I need it for modding. Currently I only extended the vanilla's method by a call to "OnCharacterTakeDamage". That should be pretty solid against future changes in the vanilla code.

Because conflict merging in that small style is so hard

I wasn't saying that merging would be hard. It would be needlessly annyoing, if there is a better way. (edited)

But that "other way" might not be too clean

Guess so