[quakenet] <day> i saw someone with his nick written in yellow in the scoreboard. he was specing
17:55
[quakenet] <day> what does that mean?
17:56
[quakenet] <day> a few min later his nick was written normally in white
17:57
[quakenet] <rand> he was spectating you
17:57
[quakenet] <day> ah
17:57
[quakenet] <rand> it's meant so that botter can auto disable bot when sby is looking
17:58
[quakenet] <day> kek
17:58
[quakenet] <day> i guess rand does not approve of this feature
17:58
[quakenet] <rand> I learnt that clicking start/stop spec/freeview
17:59
[quakenet] <rand> my auto bot is disabled way too often
18:00
[quakenet] <day> hm that explains your inconsistancy
18:00
[quakenet] <day> kek
18:02
[quakenet] <rand> I think botters will only try to look smart asking why some guys is spectating him after accusations
18:03
[quakenet] <day> do botters even exist in vanilla?
18:03
[quakenet] <day> like i havent met one that could beat me that clearly wasnt better in general
18:04
[quakenet] <Dune> I guess aim is not that important in vanilla
18:04
[quakenet] <day> and hookbots are useless if you dont know whats going on
18:04
[quakenet] <Dune> in order to beat you, they'd need to be a pretty regular player and willing to play competitively, and then it's not worth it to cheat
18:04
[quakenet] <day> yeah
18:04
[quakenet] <rand> I do not remember seeing autoaim in 0.7
18:05
[quakenet] <day> are there nade prediction bots?
18:05
[quakenet] <Dune> major releases clean up a lot of bullshit :)
18:05
[quakenet] <rand> Dune: aim is important in DM
18:06
[quakenet] <Dune> I guess you can get a pretty significant advantage with hammer/pistol spam
18:06
[quakenet] <day> doesnt help if the opponent gets all weapons and hearts/shields
18:06
[quakenet] <rand> but, it's less the case in CTF
18:06
[quakenet] <Dune> yeah, in CTF movement is too important, cheaters will lose regardless
18:06
[quakenet] <Dune> (I think)
18:06
[quakenet] <day> a good player with aimbot will obviously always beat you