Teeworlds - bridge

Teeworlds

IRC / bridge

One-way IRC channel bridge. If you want to be able to send messages to IRC, contact @Dune or @heinrich5991. https://www.teeworlds.com/?page=docs&wiki=rules/irc_rules

Between 2019-01-03 00:00:00Z and 2019-01-04 00:00:00Z

[quakenet] <Teeworlds> [teeworlds] nheir opened pull request #1947: make sv_player_slots need a reload (master...fix/player_slots) https://git.io/fhYE5

make sv_player_slots need a reload by nheir · Pull Request #1947 ...

Related to #1865

20:31

[quakenet] <rand> it seems cmake files use ./data directory (like 0.6) instead of build/{arch}/{target}/data

[quakenet] <rand> i fucked up on sv_inactivekick

20:57

[quakenet] <rand> i wanted to be able to kick spectators… dunno why, maybe because I didn't want a server to be full of inactive spec

20:57

[quakenet] <rand> it's weird

[quakenet] <rand> > (0=move player to spectator, 1=move player to free spectator slot/kick, 2=move player to free spectator slot/kick and kick spectator, 3=kick both)

21:18

[quakenet] <rand> this should be better

21:20

[quakenet] <rand> + spec_view reseting inactivetime

21:20

[quakenet] <rand> *spec_player

[quakenet] <rand> wonder if chatting should reset activity or not, and if it depends on player or spectator

if you are inactive, then you don't chat i guess?

[quakenet] <rand> but, a player chatting while not playing, should he join spectator ?

I don't think, it's our responsibility. We should kick/move only real inactive players

21:44

imho

[quakenet] <rand> well, anyone not afk can stay on a server if he want to annoy people, i'm wrong to try to prevent it, and you are right

you see

[quakenet] <Teeworlds> [teeworlds] nheir closed pull request #1947: make sv_player_slots need a reload (master...fix/player_slots) https://git.io/fhYE5

make sv_player_slots need a reload by nheir · Pull Request #1947 ...

Related to #1865

rand: can we still join spectators if the player slot count is lower than the actual player count?

[quakenet] <rand> hm, my issue totally missed the real issue ><

22:16

[quakenet] <rand> LordSk: no

22:18

[quakenet] <rand> i though this was fixed by oy elsewhere

what do you mean, missed the real issue?

[quakenet] <rand> what you are pointing

oh ok

[quakenet] <rand> what is the purpose of locking the teams ? you can't spectate unless leaving the server and nobody can join a team ?

The issue is simpler than that I think, if there is a (warning) message, the buttons are locked.

[quakenet] <Teeworlds> [teeworlds] nheir opened pull request #1948: sv_player_slots < num_player → player cannot spectate (master...fix/join_spec) https://git.io/fhYD6

sv_player_slots < num_player → player cannot spectate by nheir ...

while the previous issue was wrong (basically, 0.6 work the same way), there is another, when lowering the number of player slots, exceeding player cannot spectate themselves. There is a use case (...

Exported 27 message(s)