Bʟυɛ ♡
But the suggestion is for temporary servers that you pay for, on demand. There are no resources to be "relocated elsewhere" as it would be paid for at usage (edited)
It's all good. I didn't perceive it negatively, I just wasn't sure what you were aiming at.
I understood the proposal in a way that it needs to be actively developed (that's why it's not available until Q4 2024). From my point of view, other things would have more priority because it would benefit more people.
Of course, that's just my thought, but I think you could have added such options in the voting to see if others see it the same way.
The way the poll is currently worded, it's either have it or not. And in my opinion, there is no reason for most people here to vote no.