DDraceNetwork - off-topic

Learath2

Now that is criminal

morning

MilkeeyCat

milkeey it's growing so fast pepecry

after 4 rewrites im finally happy with type checking code xd

3

huh? i just put the link on my homepage less than a month ago

6

08:11

08:11

free money

TsFreddie

huh? i just put the link on my homepage less than a month ago

!!!!!!

I am really confused as to why Halloween sale is not listed on steamdb

Very spooky

spok

Btw burgers at McDonald's are kinda terrible lol (edited)

10:05

Not worth the price at all

discord in chess app

1

MilkeeyCat

Woo (edited)

Learath2

Woo (edited)

I have a new question santatrollet

11:14

I wanna add enums probably but I want them to be tagged

11:14

Idk what syntax to make for dat xd

tagged enums? i can't follow :o

MilkeeyCat

I have a new question santatrollet

Tagged enums? Like rust ones with data attached?

www.google.com

Rusts enums are more like a tagged union than an enum in the traditional sense

union/enum Foo {
    lol: Bar;
    kek: Baz;
}
let foo: Foo = ...;
// I want to be able to get some kind of tag to know wether `Bar` or `Baz` in `Foo`

That looks like a tagged union, well just have a hidden data field attached to the the unions

oh so something like match foo.tag() { Some("lol") => println!("lol"),

Learath2

That looks like a tagged union, well just have a hidden data field attached to the the unions

but how to get the tag, I don't want to get pattern matching xd

You can yoink golang type assertions. Or you can expose types as first class objects in your language so you can have something like if foo.(inner_type) == Baz

11:21

Or an operator instead of a member function looking thing

@Learath2 also, if you had to choose how to limit sizeof operator: it would take only types or only expressions. what is better? xd

if @foo == Baz

Foo (Bar, "lol") when greenthing

Learath2

if @foo == Baz

i will try to do procedural macros btw lol

MilkeeyCat

@Learath2 also, if you had to choose how to limit sizeof operator: it would take only types or only expressions. what is better? xd

If I had to chose I would pick only type. Then you can add a typeof (expr) to compliment it

MilkeeyCat

i will try to do procedural macros btw lol

NICE

MilkeeyCat

i will try to do procedural macros btw lol

May Allah guide you

in my noodle it doesn't look too hard xd

Learath2

if @foo == Baz

I actually like the way this one looks. Maybe if I can find more than one use for it this can be in my future language

Learath2

I actually like the way this one looks. Maybe if I can find more than one use for it this can be in my future language

a language written my learath

11:27

oh god i'm scared

0 safety. It does rm -rf --no-preserve-root / if you make a mistake

2

ddnet 3.0 will be written in that!

Actually -1 safety. I'll also randomize everything every run to simulate user error

2

what is this bot xd

1

Look at what game the bot is playing

what bot

fair

11:34

There is no bot, @MilkeeyCat was just jealous that women were emoting my messages

jealous of rosy milkeey?

200% he's from Turkey justatest

His profile was just links to some random turkish influencer

xd

Learath2

if @foo == Baz

struct Bar {}
struct Baz {}
union Foo = Bar | Baz;

let foo: Foo = Bar {};
if @foo == Bar {
    ...
}

is that ok? :DD

MilkeeyCat

struct Bar {}
struct Baz {}
union Foo = Bar | Baz;

let foo: Foo = Bar {};
if @foo == Bar {
    ...
}

is that ok? :DD

That looks pretty good. Have you considered what access looks like?

oh

Like inside that if, how would I access Bar::x e.g.?

12:26

It could just be a cast

union can be declared like this

union Foo {
    bar: Bar;
    baz: Baz;
}

12:28

and @ thingy to be sure that there's really type Bar in there

help ticket 1236

13:45

pls

definitely not me trying to play a random furry game but it too poorly optimized so i spend like three days optimizing the engine

14:18

fun fact, DO NOT use rpg maker to make anything that runs logics every frame.

14:19

their "interpreter" code is literally this

1

Pls help ticket 1237

MilkeeyCat

union can be declared like this

union Foo {
    bar: Bar;
    baz: Baz;
}

Eh, but then assignment looks weird

TsFreddie

definitely not me trying to play a random furry game but it too poorly optimized so i spend like three days optimizing the engine

That's insane

TsFreddie

definitely not me trying to play a random furry game but it too poorly optimized so i spend like three days optimizing the engine

furry rpg

15:17

@Tọm moving tiles ofc are good and should be added in ddnet, but implementation of this will look like a huge hack, it also needs client prediction, proper editor support, etc etc... so i don't really think it will just pop out in near future

zhn

furry rpg

they made an ACT with rpg maker, it really wasn't good for that

it would be so nice if C could just automagically replace . with -> when accessing fields of a struct

16:17

there is 0 reason not to do that i think

isnt it parser's skill issue?

Чтоб ночью играть

I feel colorblind

pilonpl

there is 0 reason not to do that i think

i added both to my language

16:44

ig it's useful when you don't have lsp and can't the type of a variable

i am looking at the source code right now btw

if it's a pointer or not

it just makes sense

idk what to work on