DDraceNetwork - developer

comment says: "you must edit it to solve it" xd

Replying to @MilkeeyCat Yoyo, if any of you likes doing crackmes, could you do this one https://…

<ChillerDragon> @heinrich5991 on ddnet Multeasymap there are ads for block servers by ip. Typing in the ip is quite tedious for users. If the redirect feature would allow redirecting to other ips there could be a portal to the other servers instead.

01:02

<ChillerDragon> https://zillyhuhn.com/cs/.1712538134.png

Patiga

@murpi could you please update twmap-tools to 0.3.2 for the ddnet discordbot? it adds compatibility to the bezier envelope points

done

1

01:22

rip sleep schedule

1

thanks ^^

def-

[ddnet/ddnet] Pull request closed: #8190 Fix broken rebase of ConFlock, rename previous remains of team 0 mode

01:41

github-merge-queue[bot]

[ddnet:master] 2 new commits

7fcac2a Rename /flock to /team0mode - furo321 96fa194 Merge pull request #8190 from furo321/fix-conflock - def-

ddnet-maps

[ddnet-maps:master] 1 new commit

5beebf3 M quon - ddnet-maps

is it weird that I think our manager having a 10 minute conversation with QA team guessing how Android handles permission popup after user has rejected is pointless and doesn't solve any actual problems? or is this just a normal conversation to have at work? because I think they could just spend that time writing a few lines of test code and just go from there.

04:37

am I just a complainer

04:37

oh shit I am, aren't I

04:37

Sounds like larger-company culture

chillerdragon: thanks

deen

Sounds like larger-company culture

what about the culture that just stop people from progressing

05:47

I don't feel like I fully understand that (edited)

07:01

download inkscape instead

1

but honestly, I do love shape tool and pen tool in photoshop

07:12

got me through most task I would do

TsFreddie

download inkscape instead

Or use photopea ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ (edited)

do you know discord channels where ppl can ask questions about compilers, linkers, how sections work and stuff feelsbadman

MilkeeyCat

do you know discord channels where ppl can ask questions about compilers, linkers, how sections work and stuff feelsbadman

This is a lost art, discord is the domain of zoomers and they haven’t heard what a linker is

ah gg

07:47

im one step away from logging in on stack overflow and asking there

What is your question? I do have some arcane knowledge

Ok but i wanna apologize in advance if none of this mumbo jumbo will make sense justatest

https://discord.gg/tccpp

Invite to join a server

Together C & C++

rules

07:53

@MilkeeyCat

I have such a C program

char bytes[10];

int main() {
    bytes[0] = 2;
    bytes[1] = 4;
    bytes[2] = 4;
    bytes[3] = 4;
    bytes[4] = 4;
    bytes[5] = 4;
    bytes[6] = 4;
    bytes[7] = 4;
    bytes[8] = 4;
    bytes[9] = 6;

    return 0;
}

Since bytes variable is not initialized it goes to .bss section(maybe) so when call cc main.c -c addresses which point to that memory will be 0x0. Like here:

   4:    c6 05 00 00 00 00 02     movb   $0x2,0x0(%rip)        # b <main+0xb>
   b:    c6 05 00 00 00 00 04     movb   $0x4,0x0(%rip)        # 12 <main+0x12>

I will be set after linking. And everything works and all gud. But why in .rela.text section(run readelf -a main.o) it goes from bytes - 5 to bytes + 4 why not from bytes to bytes + 9

Relocation section '.rela.text' at offset 0x1c8 contains 10 entries:
  Offset          Info           Type           Sym. Value    Sym. Name + Addend
000000000006  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes - 5
00000000000d  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes - 4
000000000014  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes - 3
00000000001b  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes - 2
000000000022  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes - 1
000000000029  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes + 0
000000000030  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes + 1
000000000037  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes + 2
00000000003e  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes + 3
000000000045  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes + 4

07:57

@Learath2

MilkeeyCat

do you know discord channels where ppl can ask questions about compilers, linkers, how sections work and stuff feelsbadman

what u need to know

08:02

ah i didnt scroll

@Teero

MilkeeyCat

I have such a C program

char bytes[10];

int main() {
    bytes[0] = 2;
    bytes[1] = 4;
    bytes[2] = 4;
    bytes[3] = 4;
    bytes[4] = 4;
    bytes[5] = 4;
    bytes[6] = 4;
    bytes[7] = 4;
    bytes[8] = 4;
    bytes[9] = 6;

    return 0;
}

Since bytes variable is not initialized it goes to .bss section(maybe) so when call cc main.c -c addresses which point to that memory will be 0x0. Like here:

   4:    c6 05 00 00 00 00 02     movb   $0x2,0x0(%rip)        # b <main+0xb>
   b:    c6 05 00 00 00 00 04     movb   $0x4,0x0(%rip)        # 12 <main+0x12>

I will be set after linking. And everything works and all gud. But why in .rela.text section(run readelf -a main.o) it goes from bytes - 5 to bytes + 4 why not from bytes to bytes + 9

Relocation section '.rela.text' at offset 0x1c8 contains 10 entries:
  Offset          Info           Type           Sym. Value    Sym. Name + Addend
000000000006  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes - 5
00000000000d  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes - 4
000000000014  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes - 3
00000000001b  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes - 2
000000000022  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes - 1
000000000029  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes + 0
000000000030  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes + 1
000000000037  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes + 2
00000000003e  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes + 3
000000000045  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes + 4

i think this is mostly a relocation algorithm detail

Average linux experience. Can confirm. Can recommend. Would do again.

Replying to @Teero 23WkPz4CNX.png

Learath2

This is a lost art, discord is the domain of zoomers and they haven’t heard what a linker is

i'm a zoomer apparently

meloƞ

@Teero

sometimes there are good memes in there.

@MilkeeyCat i invite u to the llvm discord https://discord.com/invite/xS7Z362 here there is knowledgable people

are there good memes?

MilkeeyCat

I have such a C program

char bytes[10];

int main() {
    bytes[0] = 2;
    bytes[1] = 4;
    bytes[2] = 4;
    bytes[3] = 4;
    bytes[4] = 4;
    bytes[5] = 4;
    bytes[6] = 4;
    bytes[7] = 4;
    bytes[8] = 4;
    bytes[9] = 6;

    return 0;
}

Since bytes variable is not initialized it goes to .bss section(maybe) so when call cc main.c -c addresses which point to that memory will be 0x0. Like here:

   4:    c6 05 00 00 00 00 02     movb   $0x2,0x0(%rip)        # b <main+0xb>
   b:    c6 05 00 00 00 00 04     movb   $0x4,0x0(%rip)        # 12 <main+0x12>

I will be set after linking. And everything works and all gud. But why in .rela.text section(run readelf -a main.o) it goes from bytes - 5 to bytes + 4 why not from bytes to bytes + 9

Relocation section '.rela.text' at offset 0x1c8 contains 10 entries:
  Offset          Info           Type           Sym. Value    Sym. Name + Addend
000000000006  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes - 5
00000000000d  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes - 4
000000000014  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes - 3
00000000001b  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes - 2
000000000022  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes - 1
000000000029  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes + 0
000000000030  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes + 1
000000000037  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes + 2
00000000003e  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes + 3
000000000045  000300000002 R_X86_64_PC32     0000000000000000 bytes + 4

Global variables get zeroed, maybe it matters