Guild icon
DDraceNetwork
DDraceNetwork / questions
For newcomers to ask questions and get help. Also check https://wiki.ddnet.org/wiki/FAQ
Between 2023-09-15 00:00:00Z and 2023-09-16 00:00:00Z
Avatar
Avatar
Neiky
I have a question, it's possible to connect a bot using an api link in js or py ?
Do you want to make a bot for DDnet?
Avatar
Avatar
kucer0043
Do you want to make a bot for DDnet?
A chat bot*
Avatar
Avatar
Neiky
A chat bot*
I know a library on node js
Avatar
Avatar
Neiky
A chat bot*
Library for (ingame) teeworlds bots.. Latest version: 2.4.8, last published: a month ago. Start using teeworlds in your project by running npm i teeworlds. There are no other projects in the npm registry using teeworlds.
Avatar
Note that bots are not allowed on official servers
Avatar
Avatar
Jupstar ✪
Note that bots are not allowed on official servers
There are also unofficial servers 🙂
Avatar
Well to be clear, we have a rule to not talk about bots on this discord
07:05
Especially not about the development
07:05
This only motivates ppl to use them or create them
Avatar
The library dont work with me, i changed the code and it works but it's long and i want to know if a api link exist (edited)
Avatar
Avatar
Neiky
The library dont work with me, i changed the code and it works but it's long and i want to know if a api link exist (edited)
link to the game api?
08:36
regarding the library, please contact @Swarfey
Avatar
Avatar
Jupstar ✪
Note that bots are not allowed on official servers
well, there is a discord-bridge on the official ddnet block server & another one from childerdrangon on multeasy 😮
Avatar
Server side it's ok. But client side actually not
Avatar
both client side bots*
Avatar
Yes thats not ok
Avatar
okay, good to know
Avatar
I dunno the rules for block tho
13:04
But any automated input is not allowed on ddnet
Avatar
yea, i believed that the bot rule only counts for automated input or bots that actually harm gameplay
Avatar
I think it applies to all
13:05
Not only handful
13:05
Harm
Avatar
But deal that out with the admins
Avatar
I thought the rule was 'no cheating' not 'no botting'
13:06
Cheats arent always bots and vice versa
Avatar
yep, i thought so too
13:06
but i cant even find the rules anymore
Avatar
The rules are, clients that are listed in the server list, must be human players
Avatar
Avatar
noby
I thought the rule was 'no cheating' not 'no botting'
problem is. if everyone says "this is the rule" then u can flood servers with bots i can fully understand that these 1-2 bots make no harm.. but if u don't make easy clear rules. ppl start to lay them out to their wishes
Avatar
Avatar
Jupstar ✪
problem is. if everyone says "this is the rule" then u can flood servers with bots i can fully understand that these 1-2 bots make no harm.. but if u don't make easy clear rules. ppl start to lay them out to their wishes
Yeah there will always be people who try to find loopholes and act in bad faith but this rule doesnt prevent that either; they could just open up many copies of ddnet instead and it wouldnt make the behavior any less annoying
Avatar
but then it's at least clearly against the rule
13:32
doesnt help for the problem
13:32
but for handling it
Avatar
Considering the intent here is pretty important imo, flooding servers/artificially inflating playercount is pretty clearly bad faith but running a bridge bot doesnt seem like it fits that description
Avatar
Avatar
Jupstar ✪
but then it's at least clearly against the rule
Technically it wouldnt be tho?
Avatar
ok then they run 64 discord bridges xD
Avatar
Avatar
noby
Technically it wouldnt be tho?
well i don't mean gameplay rules above. but i think our master server rules are. server list = real humans
Avatar
So if i open 64 copies of ddnet client on my laptop and join each one to a different server is that breaking master rules
Avatar
it's a greyzone, but strictly speaking probably not against the rule. except you could say 4 humans per ip is common for all servers in total
13:35
even if it's only handled per server
Avatar
Avatar
Jupstar ✪
The rules are, clients that are listed in the server list, must be human players
Right, i thought this rule was mostly so server owners dont inflate their own player count by adding fake clients
Avatar
@noby hi noby long time no talk
13:45
is ur gf dealer still there
13:45
ez
Avatar
This is 2 different people lol
Avatar
what is "/dnd" command?
Avatar
Avatar
Jupstar ✪
But any automated input is not allowed on ddnet
hmmmm. so bots that prevent inputs are allowed?
14:40
thats a big loophole xdd
14:41
if you only ban by definition ofc (edited)
Avatar
Avatar
Teero
hmmmm. so bots that prevent inputs are allowed?
no
Avatar
Avatar
exosphere
what is "/dnd" command?
I think it prevents you from getting chat messages, maybe?
Avatar
Avatar
heinrich5991
no
gimme a definition
Avatar
an approximation is: any gameplay-related input must work the same as in an official client
Avatar
so something like a spinbot would be allowed? it doesnt change any gameplay in ddrace right?
Avatar
does the official client work like that?
Avatar
xd
Avatar
Avatar
Teero
so something like a spinbot would be allowed? it doesnt change any gameplay in ddrace right?
I don't see a spinbot in the official client
Avatar
there is one on the serverside xddd
14:50
with the debug dummies thing
14:50
anyway
Avatar
that's ok anyway
Avatar
so no input modifications?
Avatar
from the client
14:51
the server can do it if it wants
14:51
i doubt ddnet would add cheats to its servers
Avatar
k so if my pc were to just leave out the packets of inputs that would make me die or misshook that would be valid?
14:52
i mean out of pure luck.
Avatar
that also falls under automated input
14:52
it automatically modifies your original input
14:53
if u by hand manuially unplug your network cable for 1 microsecond
Avatar
so lags are bannable? xd
Avatar
it might be valid
Avatar
Avatar
Jupstar ✪
if u by hand manuially unplug your network cable for 1 microsecond
thats a hard learning curve xdd
Avatar
Avatar
Teero
so lags are bannable? xd
at a certain point u could argue like that yes
Avatar
are outside applicatioins bannable? like some robotic arm playing tw?
Avatar
is that a human for you?
Avatar
sure if im controlling it
Avatar
if it reacts to your normal brain activity
Avatar
Avatar
Jupstar ✪
if it reacts to your normal brain activity
ill just stimulate my brain to play tw xD:
14:56
unbannable
Avatar
get a cyborg.. then u never get tired from playing
Avatar
Avatar
Teero
are outside applicatioins bannable? like some robotic arm playing tw?
yes
Avatar
at least muscle wise
Avatar
the new tw drug released now!
14:56
only 9,99€
Avatar
go to gym to improve at tw
Avatar
i play tw to improve at tw
Avatar
@Ryozuki just control your arm with rust. there should be a library for that
Avatar
Avatar
heinrich5991
yes
are physics breaking exploits bannable?
Avatar
I don't think we have precise rules for that
15:01
but it'd be nice if you reported that physics breaking exploit instead
Avatar
Avatar
Teero
@Ryozuki just control your arm with rust. there should be a library for that
there is a library for butt plugs
Avatar
i dont think that helps
Avatar
the most blazingly fast, memory-efficient, thread and type safe buttplug library gigachad
Avatar
I see what you, rust guys, are doing in free time
Avatar
Avatar
Ryozuki
there is a library for butt plugs
it seems to be for all sex toys, truly revolutionary
Avatar
what
Avatar
In the new ticket system for reporting, they require me to copy the server information there, but how can I do this if I am banned?
Avatar
u have to click "ban appeal"
Avatar
Avatar
heinrich5991
but it'd be nice if you reported that physics breaking exploit instead
I doubt anyone would do that.. If theres some type of reward for revealing bugs I would imagine people would actually report stuff like that maybe a bug hunter role on discord or something like that currently getting a rank 1/finish or something like that is far more rewarding than anything else you get for sharing physic bugs
Avatar
rank 1 is temporary, clout is forever
Avatar
You are temporary. Die. In 80 years or so. (edited)
Exported 108 message(s)