DDraceNetwork - developer

https://www.brilliantmonocle.com/

02:23

Hacker monocle xd

I mean it's a better design than what https://youtube.com/@ZackFreedman provided the community with. And has more functionality than just being a teleprompter. I'll definetly get one as soon as I can.

Zack Freedman

Welcome to my workshop, where wicked widgets, wild wearables, and wholesome wonder are wasted on weak witticisms and worthless wordplay. We once worked for whoever wanted wires to work, but the wacky world of wcontent has wiped our wherewithal. The thing on my face is a wearable computer I use as a teleprompter! Send gizmos, gadgets, and sampl...

but I don't see the server in the general list... although yesterday registration was normal (edited)

09:23

09:29

hmm, many players can't connect to russian ddnet servers

09:30

cloudflare cant connect to russian web server too (same host as ddnet, myarena) (edited)

Matodor

hmm, many players can't connect to russian ddnet servers

oh, that explains the lowe number of players

09:45

I'd open a ticket with the hoster but can't reach their website either

deen

oh, that explains the lowe number of players

myarena under 1tb ddos

09:47

yesterday

09:47

09:48

Dear clients, we are witnessing very large attacks, more than 1 Terabit. It is difficult to cope with attacks of such power even for those who charge six or even seven figures for protection. As you know, our protection is free. We do network filtering on our own, using programs that we have developed ourselves, and we pay for channels from what we earn. The cost of channels is huge, and for a small host like us, protection against such attacks is very difficult. We are currently looking for solutions. Thanks for understanding.

1

1

@heinrich5991 @Learath2 is this conceptually going in the right direction? https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/pull/5949

Just enough 0.7 client support to join a server by ChillerDragon · ...

While keeping 0.6 fully working and untouched This adds the option to connect via 0.7 This is the first working version there is still work todo There are a few known bugs and missing featues to na...

12:07

yo @Patiga any chance you are motivated to add 0.7 map format support to ddnet? :)

ChillerDragon

yo @Patiga any chance you are motivated to add 0.7 map format support to ddnet? :)

I already started this in #5737, but I haven gotten around to finishing it (bezier support is missing)

https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/pull/5737

PoC: Forward compatiblity for upstream map item changes by Robyt3 ·...

Add a version item check in CMap. Support loading maps with CMapItemLayerTilemap version 4, which makes use of the CTile::m_Skip member to compress tile layers. TODO: Support loading maps with CMap...

ChillerDragon

yo @Patiga any chance you are motivated to add 0.7 map format support to ddnet? :)

pls allow 0.7 to die

ah amazing thanks @Robyt3

Hello! Why when i build DDNet Client on linux its only working for me ? Others ppl couldn't use it and they got error , is there any static command for building client in linux?

If the glibc dep is too high u cannot do it

12:47

Similar for other deps, tho they can be work around by using bundled libs

12:48

Why wouldn't the other person simply compile it

1

ChillerDragon: yes, going into the right direction

12:56

maybe you could also move the net message translation into a new file?

12:56

SendInfo7 is superfluous, just do it in the net message translation, I'd say

Thought so to but wanted to stay consistent with how it’s done Server side (@heinrich5991)

heinrich5991#9827

maybe you could also move the net message translation into a new file?

I don't like the server version, it pollutes the file. let's ask @Learath2 on his opinion maybe

Yea sounds nice (@heinrich5991)

heinrich5991#9827

SendInfo7 is superfluous, just do it in the net message translation, I'd say

and the src/game/version.h constants can probably also go directly into the translation, don't need the constants, I think

I don't like the server version either

12:59

Problem I had with info was that it had to work with caching properly. So it wasnt very easy to achieve

ah. that problem doesn't exist on the client side, so we should be good there

Do u really plan to merge this?

I think it should be fine if it's clearly separated

13:01

so yes, I thought that this would be nice to have in a finished form

It adds more dependencies. We should go away from old dependencies

13:01

Have u never thought about that your decisions are bad for the projects future?

I'm not sure what you mean by dependencies here, do you mean more code?

If we support 0.7 ppl will use this

13:03

If we don't do it. They don't

Jupstar ✪

Have u never thought about that your decisions are bad for the projects future?

sentences with "never" are usually false. yes, I do try to reflect on decisions and want to see whether they're good or bad

I hope u are aware that most decisions about the project were BCS of u

yes, people will probably use it. you'd probably be annoyed by bug reports etc. coming from 0.7? I see, I understand, I think

But u aren't the only person that likes ddnet

im against adding 0.7 stuff

13:06

if we vote on this

you probably mean 0.7 compatibility? or also stuff like 0.7 skin support?

0.7 compat