DDraceNetwork - general

bind i "+toggle player_name tep.; player_color_body 10700296"

00:39

the name is not coming, help me

00:40

and if you can put the skin bind together I would appreciate it :3

Lukov

bind i "+toggle player_name tep.; player_color_body 10700296"

bind i "player_name tep.; player_color_body 10700296"

ƤØŢĀŤ0Co

bind i "player_name tep.; player_color_body 10700296"

now it doesn't change the color D:

It takes a moment

wait

Also do this in f1 player_use_custom_color 1

I think it was

01:02

he was

01:02

@ƤØŢĀŤ0CoI LOVE U

Have a good one!

Is there any weather in Teeworld?

Thctac

Is there any weather in Teeworld?

There you go

9

(edited)

deen

The hoster gave up on the DoS protection, so they don't exist anymore

what a shame, it was a good server feelsbadman

2

Good

deen

The hoster gave up on the DoS protection, so they don't exist anymore

Which server provider was ist?

https://www.kernelhost.com/, they spent a lot of effort on the protection, so I'm really thankful. It was unfortunate that it didn't work in the end

10:11

I'm gonna say it. Fuck DDosers!

3

Meekrioz

I'm gonna say it. Fuck DDosers!

ayyoooo

Okay lets ddos the ddosers

10:44

We only need a minor to say that he is the ddoser when they sue

ok ill do it

1

ano

ayyoooo

Meekrioz

I'm gonna say it. Fuck DDosers!

this was definitely screen capped and pinned inside the ddoser server

I already get target ddosed so who cares OMEGADANCE

Lumpy ◐ω◑

what a shame, it was a good server feelsbadman

If our other new approaches don't work, ping me again and we could just host an unprotected server with them maybe

deen

If our other new approaches don't work, ping me again and we could just host an unprotected server with them maybe

wasn't the point of ger3 the ddos protection? or why would we need an unprotected server there?

Because maybe some people were getting really good ping there

oh that wasn't the case for me, it was a bit worse than other ger, but still ok

Everything below 100 is acceptable

Lumpy ◐ω◑

wasn't the point of ger3 the ddos protection? or why would we need an unprotected server there?

effective ddos protection is very expensive Balancer is cheaper but difficult to implement

15:37

ye I thought we've beaten the ddosers, but nope feelsbadman

Balancer for me has been the only effective method to deal with +1 gigabit traffic with 30000 solicitations per second with IP spoofing in a botnet attack from morocco

15:44

although such attacks usually make the server not visible to the outside for a few minutes

if you cant beat the ddosers, join to the ddosers

5

This isn’t a website we are trying to protect, a balancer isn’t much use. Gameservers can’t be sharded

Yep

Learath2

This isn’t a website we are trying to protect, a balancer isn’t much use. Gameservers can’t be sharded

The balancer is configured on the ports that you open the server and analyzes only that UDP traffic

15:49

The typical balancer is the web balancer but there are also for TCP/UDP ports or special ports of course the documentation or configuration depends on where u have hosted your server

Balances between what? There is one gameserver at the end of the day

15:50

You can split the traffic up into multiple reverse proxies, but what use is that, you just as much can’t protect the proxies like you couldn’t protect the original gameserver

Yek

Balancer for me has been the only effective method to deal with +1 gigabit traffic with 30000 solicitations per second with IP spoofing in a botnet attack from morocco

i thought spoofed traffic and botnet traffic were usually mutually exclusive

The only point would be to have sacrificial proxies which is what we have planned next. A proxy gets ddos’d to oblivion, you lose the players on that, unlucky but better than no one being able to play

noby

i thought spoofed traffic and botnet traffic were usually mutually exclusive

u create a main network subnet "xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx" and that subnet is linked to more subnets of different regions and different capacities If unusual traffic is found on the main subnet that is distributed

15:58

Worst I've seen are using a botnet and spoofing player IPs

Yek

u create a main network subnet "xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx" and that subnet is linked to more subnets of different regions and different capacities If unusual traffic is found on the main subnet that is distributed

sounds roughly similar to the idea learath mentioned except instead its distributed across multiple machines before reaching the server

How to do this? Spinning with hook (tf)

@noby but that doesnt work here

16:28

There is nothing to balance on, cuz its 1 gameserver at the end

Ryozuki

@noby but that doesnt work here

i think the idea is that players get connected to a random proxy which connects to the game server, which only accepts connections from one of these proxies

Ryozuki

There is nothing to balance on, cuz its 1 gameserver at the end

You could balance between proxies, maybe it could make sense if you interpret it like that

16:30

But that is by no means the usual meaning of “balancing”

@Learath2 is the attack pure bryteforcing or abusing something in the protoc?

16:34

Stupid mobile

Ryozuki

@Learath2 is the attack pure bryteforcing or abusing something in the protoc?

“the attack” is a bit of a misnomer. We get all flavors of attacks you can imagine

Meh idk why i even try to think anythiny xd (edited)

16:36

I see

it would probably help against a lot of types of attack

i have a new gpu = ddnet client dont wanne start HUHH

Darius - ;v

i have a new gpu = ddnet client dont wanne start HUHH

rtx 4090 with 30k fps

16:56

16:57

with that if u get an input lag of 0

16:57

Darius - ;v

i have a new gpu = ddnet client dont wanne start HUHH

AMD beta drivers? Check https://ddnet.org/news/amd-beta-opengl-crash/

directly replaced the vulkan.dll and it gave me more fps

17:00

deen

AMD beta drivers? Check https://ddnet.org/news/amd-beta-opengl-crash/

worked ur the best aPES_FastParty

I really wish that AMD would fix this

vaneo

How to do this? Spinning with hook (tf)

hookfly

noby

i think the idea is that players get connected to a random proxy which connects to the game server, which only accepts connections from one of these proxies

Yes great idea, we can use the proxies that are flooding the serverlist sometimes, which are also expanding KoG to block for example.

gerdoe

hookfly

Thanks

This but with anime

17:19

Specifically edgerunners

At least this isn't an issue with ddnet

pilonpl

At least this isn't an issue with ddnet

Except for top 10 points people

17:35

I mean they have some maps left but they hard af

you can always play the same map twice

That's the same as saying that you can always play a really good game twice or rewatch an anime/tv series/movie

noby

i think the idea is that players get connected to a random proxy which connects to the game server, which only accepts connections from one of these proxies

how the player would connect to the proxy from the server browser?

It would probably be handled by the client