



Pos 0 -1 EMPTY OR Pos 0 1 EMPTY), or do I have to create a new Index for each possibility?




Pos 0 -1 INDEX 2 OR 1 XFLIP or 1 YFLIPINDEX with NOTINDEX will turn that 'whitelist' into a 'blacklist', so it won't trigger if any of the specifed id's are found

EMPTY is only syntactic sugar for INDEX 0
and FULL for NOTINDEX 0



AND clause exist? If I want to say that a position should be full, but not the Index 2, is it possible to write Pos 0 1 NOTINDEX 0 AND NOTINDEX 2?
Index 3
Pos 0 1 FULL
Pos 0 1 NOTINDEX 2,
is the first command overwritten?

Index 3
Pos 0 1 FULL
Pos 0 1 NOTINDEX 2,
is the first command overwritten? 

AND clause exist? If I want to say that a position should be full, but not the Index 2, is it possible to write Pos 0 1 NOTINDEX 0 AND NOTINDEX 2? AND is done with OR there. Pos 0 1 NOTINDEX 0 OR 2 would be what you want there

AND is done with OR there. Pos 0 1 NOTINDEX 0 OR 2 would be what you want there 



NewRun, I create an Index (Index 34) where the 8 blocks around are FULL, and later in another Index (Index 39) I check if this block is in the neighbourhood, but I feel like when the second Index is called, the blocks are still in their default Index. Is there a way to prioritize indexes? (Make sure Index 34 is called before Index 39)



NoLayerCopy under NewRun to have the changes of the rules be visible for the next rules that get executed