Pos 0 -1 EMPTY OR Pos 0 1 EMPTY
), or do I have to create a new Index for each possibility?Pos 0 -1 INDEX 2 OR 1 XFLIP or 1 YFLIP
INDEX
with NOTINDEX
will turn that 'whitelist' into a 'blacklist', so it won't trigger if any of the specifed id's are foundEMPTY
is only syntactic sugar for INDEX 0
and FULL
for NOTINDEX 0
AND
clause exist? If I want to say that a position should be full, but not the Index 2, is it possible to write Pos 0 1 NOTINDEX 0 AND NOTINDEX 2
?Index 3
Pos 0 1 FULL
Pos 0 1 NOTINDEX 2
,
is the first command overwritten?Index 3
Pos 0 1 FULL
Pos 0 1 NOTINDEX 2
,
is the first command overwritten? AND
clause exist? If I want to say that a position should be full, but not the Index 2, is it possible to write Pos 0 1 NOTINDEX 0 AND NOTINDEX 2
? AND
is done with OR
there. Pos 0 1 NOTINDEX 0 OR 2
would be what you want thereAND
is done with OR
there. Pos 0 1 NOTINDEX 0 OR 2
would be what you want there NewRun
, I create an Index (Index 34) where the 8 blocks around are FULL, and later in another Index (Index 39) I check if this block is in the neighbourhood, but I feel like when the second Index is called, the blocks are still in their default Index. Is there a way to prioritize indexes? (Make sure Index 34 is called before Index 39)NoLayerCopy
under NewRun
to have the changes of the rules be visible for the next rules that get executed