DDraceNetwork - off-topic

3

11:01

кроксикот

DAFE

Click to see attachment 🖼️

К бою готов

yuppie potato is mod now

Це шо, офф-топ + інтернешенал-лангвеч мікс?

0° - ✅ 90° - ✅ 180° - ✅ 270° - cammostripes

what

270° feels weird

tru

but is correct

i just think -90°

Same

21:05

I invented a better system

I want to make a system, where degrees are determined by this: left side: °0 -> °180 and right side: 0° -> 180°

21:06

this way you'll know which side is that degree facing

or, you can use radian

Chairn

or, you can use radian

bruh

90*3 = 270

21:06

there now it doesnt feel weird

even 9*3 = 27 feels weird

21:07

while you know it's right, you get a feeling of that odd number to be somewhat invalid

Σ_i=1^∞ i = -1/12

21:08

that is weird

mmmm nah, somehow I could imagine myself reading that

well, discord doesn't have latex rendering so...

maybe cuz of all the algebra lessons I take to make my own velocity system kek

its technically only applicable in very specific situations and not at all true in a general sense

louis

its technically only applicable in very specific situations and not at all true in a general sense

Anything that uses ∞ is already retarded calculation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1_%2B_2_%2B_3_%2B_4_%2B_%E2%8B%AF

1%2B_2%2B3%2B4%2B_%E2%8B%AF

21:12

1+1+1+1+1+... = -1/2

21:13

21:14

1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + ⋯ = ζ(0) = −1/2

Chairn

Σ_i=1^∞ i = -1/12

Well this is actually only a specific kind of summation where that's correct

21:15

The ramanujan sum of that series is -1/12. However saying the sum is -1/12 is kinda misleading as classically it'd be divergent

any geometric method for calculating both jump velocity and gravity velocity in a way, where point A goes to a certain height (y), but is capped at 1 second (x = 1) (same on gravity velocity calculation, but in reverse) (edited)

what?

pilonpl

I invented a better system

1 - 0 2 - 90 3 - 180 4 - 270 5 - 45 6 - 135 7 - 225 8 - 315

21:18

@Chairn

21:18

not sure how to represent it as a method

21:19

similar to Celeste, but I think it's somewhat decent explanation It's just stupid to use time like 3x (edited)

pilonpl

1 - 0 2 - 90 3 - 180 4 - 270 5 - 45 6 - 135 7 - 225 8 - 315

ah yes 1 = 0

It makes more sense

It doesn't really matter

21:36

It just looks better

21:38

My system is better because most used directions have a simple representation

Cellegen

Click to see attachment 🖼️

what are both axis?