Guild icon
DDraceNetwork
DDraceNetwork / mapping
Here you can talk about mapping, ask mapping related questions or request new ratings for released maps
Between 2022-06-23 00:00:00Z and 2022-06-24 00:00:00Z
Avatar
Avatar
ᶰ°Konͧsti
im fully handicapped when it comes to create any kind of graphics
just find a good font in word, take a screenshot, use magic wand in any image software to make background transparent, import as quad, done
Avatar
you could also just go looking for fonts and download it and then use a text tool in some image editor and make it a mapres
09:47
there are a lot of websites that have free fonts for you to look for
Avatar
@louis @deen with adding timecps to all ddnet maps wouldn't it kind of ruin maps like justice1+2,brainduck 1+2,puzzle partners and dilirious?
Avatar
puzzle box and rocketiskey also wouldnt make much sense with timecps
Avatar
Sure, doesn't make sense for all maps. You can just mark them as completed
Avatar
I completely disagree with the approach to these rerates, making Sunny Side Up a 3 star and the base for all other ratings seems so inherently flawed to me. Unless you plan on rerating every map in every category these rerates seem so out of touch. Especially moving over 30+ maps to moderate with seemingly no consideration for what that will skew in the moderate category. Just because the current testers are too busy freebasing coke to figure out how to rate a novice map doesn't mean the rerates have to be bad as well. Just an example, on your spreadsheet Future_Race is recommended to be moved to Moderate 1 or 2, for the reasoning: it's a complete gores map. Meanwhile, there is already a gores map in the Moderate category, Zaiross-Gores which is much more difficult and is only a 1 star Moderate. A lot of the reasonings I see in the spreadsheet are about how it's "frustrating for noobs," or "no noob would ever pass." Not every novice map needs to be an impossible to fail boring line with no unfreeze.
Avatar
Avatar
NovaShock
@louis @deen with adding timecps to all ddnet maps wouldn't it kind of ruin maps like justice1+2,brainduck 1+2,puzzle partners and dilirious?
delirious already has cps
Avatar
Avatar
Chairn
delirious already has cps
was just mentioning puzzle maps that I could remember xd sorry
Avatar
Avatar
NovaShock
@louis @deen with adding timecps to all ddnet maps wouldn't it kind of ruin maps like justice1+2,brainduck 1+2,puzzle partners and dilirious?
i agree
19:59
well maybe useless soon when ppl upload full runs to youtube anyways and since ppl want free r1 demos
Avatar
Avatar
Telo
I completely disagree with the approach to these rerates, making Sunny Side Up a 3 star and the base for all other ratings seems so inherently flawed to me. Unless you plan on rerating every map in every category these rerates seem so out of touch. Especially moving over 30+ maps to moderate with seemingly no consideration for what that will skew in the moderate category. Just because the current testers are too busy freebasing coke to figure out how to rate a novice map doesn't mean the rerates have to be bad as well. Just an example, on your spreadsheet Future_Race is recommended to be moved to Moderate 1 or 2, for the reasoning: it's a complete gores map. Meanwhile, there is already a gores map in the Moderate category, Zaiross-Gores which is much more difficult and is only a 1 star Moderate. A lot of the reasonings I see in the spreadsheet are about how it's "frustrating for noobs," or "no noob would ever pass." Not every novice map needs to be an impossible to fail boring line with no unfreeze.
incredible analysis! you fail to realize that moderate is still not well rated itself, but only novice is planned for a rerate currently because it affects the most players negatively. how many new players have you played with? how many have you taught? have you watched noobs fail? do you know what they often fail to? your only argument here is that it makes an easier gores map the same difficulty as a currently mod 1 gores map, which is harder. that does not provide any feedback on if the rerating is warranted and instead focused on the rest of the categories, which has already been discussed as well. if you would like to provide real feedback instead of calling my rerates "bad" you can do so in the spreadsheet (edited)
Avatar
the only thing i know is that careless has got to go
Avatar
I still don't think anyone has been able to convince me that my basis for rerates is wrong. What I'm going off of, is that Tangerine is 1*, Sunny Side Up is 3*, and Lavender Forest is 5*. I do not believe these maps to be far off of whatever rating they should actually be, and if you still disagree with this, put it in the spreadsheet (edited)
23:03
when you say it's bad to base it off of Sunny Side Up as 3* then that means you inherently disagree with the rating. What do you rate it then?
23:05
If people think that Lavender Forest is harder than a gores map then we're fucked as a community
23:07
Also the last thing you said is garbage because it implies I only want a " straight line" for novice maps, which is leaps and bounds ahead of saying "no noob would ever pass"
23:07
ridiculous
Avatar
wtf nobody here knows how to argue respectfully lmao
Avatar
Avatar
cyberFighter
the only thing i know is that careless has got to go
fax
23:46
and all the bores
23:46
add beginner category
Avatar
just remove gores
Exported 24 message(s)