DDraceNetwork - developer

@ds273if everyone knows that faking is trivial, does that not most fix most of the problems with faking?

some people dont like when random people finish in their name and mess up their statistics

I guess

https://www.sqlite.org/stricttables.html

00:55

sqlite with type checking ^^

ds273

some people dont like when random people finish in their name and mess up their statistics

Bro accounts has been spoken in this channel so many times, like... Even other people have created proof of concept but has led no where. Just play as henrich5991, I'm sure he wont mind ;) hehe

people have played under my name before

01:31

or even behaved really badly

bors[bot]

[ddnet:master] 2 new commits

da7dfda Disable connection reuse in curl (fixes #4342) - def- 16b431c Merge #4401 - bors[bot]

01:36

bors[bot]

[ddnet/ddnet] Issue closed: #4342 Built-in Update mechanism causing SIGABORT

01:36

bors[bot]

[ddnet/ddnet] Pull request closed: #4401 Disable connection reuse in curl (fixes #4342)

bors[bot]

[ddnet:master] 2 new commits

5be5f10 Fix stack-buffer-overflow in Whisper (fixes #4400) - def- 33be69f Merge #4402 - bors[bot]

01:46

bors[bot]

[ddnet/ddnet] Issue closed: #4400 stack-buffer-overflow in Whisper

01:46

bors[bot]

[ddnet/ddnet] Pull request closed: #4402 Fix stack-buffer-overflow in Whisper (fixes #4400)

ddnet-maps

[ddnet-maps:master] 1 new commit

19d993b A Huanghu, M EdgeDuel - ddnet-maps

Thanks :) (@n000b)

n000b

@chillerdragon#0000 if i see a tourney coming i will try to tag you. But i am also not really active actually so not sure if i am a big help

09:25

Getting more finishes and points from fakers is not too harmful imo.

09:26

Harming reputation through bad behavior is worse. But then there is barely any faker out there that has no obvious giveaways. So the only people that get fooled are casuals that likley never did or never will meet the real player

09:27

And then also how to decide who is real and who isn’t? Do you want to declare 9/10 players using the name „Blue“ as fake?

Robyt3

[ddnet/ddnet] Pull request opened: #4403 Remove redundant *count >= max_count check

count and max_count don't change after the check in the while loop.

Checklist

[ ] Tested the change ingame
[ ] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
[ ] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
[ ] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
[ ] Considered possible null pointers and out of bounds array indexing
[ ] Changed no physics that affect existing maps
[ ] Tested the change with [ASan+UBSan or valgrin...

10:06

bors[bot]

[ddnet:master] 2 new commits

053981e refactor UI scrollbars - Robyt3 ca558f4 Merge #4398 - bors[bot]

10:06

bors[bot]

[ddnet/ddnet] Pull request closed: #4398 Synchronize with upstream and refactor UI scrollbars

bors[bot]

[ddnet:master] 2 new commits

06a1d28 remove redundant *count >= max_count check - Robyt3 d02ffef Merge #4403 - bors[bot]

10:18

bors[bot]

[ddnet/ddnet] Pull request closed: #4403 Remove redundant *count >= max_count check

TIL zoom has a optional parameter. very convienient c:

Added in 15.6 iirc

Anyone got an idea why "systemctl start mariadb" times out? https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/pull/4392

13:14

I'm trying to get a mariadb server running on github build job for the tests

I see no systemctl in there @deen

oh yeah, I removed it and tried to start mariadb manually now

14:48

Is there a way to ssh into the github job?

yes

14:49

let me find it

def-

[ddnet/ddnet] Pull request opened: #4404 test/serverbrowser: delete pConsole

==235823==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks Indirect leak of 65632 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x563636cc2fc9 in malloc (/media/ddnet/testrunner+0x37afc9) #1 0x563636e0fd89 in CHeap::NewChunk() /media/ddnet/src/engine/shared/memheap.cpp:14:17 #2 0x563636e10aee in CHeap::Reset() /media/ddnet/src/engine/shared/memheap.cpp:63:2 #3 0x563636d954a5 in CConsole::CExecutionQueue::Reset() /media/ddnet/src/engine/shared/console.h:188:12 #4 0x563636d4a...

https://github.com/mxschmitt/action-tmate

GitHub - mxschmitt/action-tmate: Debug your GitHub Actions via SSH ...

Debug your GitHub Actions via SSH by using tmate to get access to the runner system itself. - GitHub - mxschmitt/action-tmate: Debug your GitHub Actions via SSH by using tmate to get access to the ...

14:52

nothing official it seems

ok, got it working finally

maybe I misremembered it from somewhere else

14:52

what was the problem?

with mysqld_safe, but still weird that systemctl was hanging

14:52

I don't know, couldn't find anything relevant with journalctl

14:52

systemctl start mysql would just hang

14:54

now just the actual postgres port missing

what was the reason for moving to ubuntu 20.04?

18.04 uses old sqlite, which doesn't support window functions

14:56

and we use window functions all over

I see

bors[bot]

[ddnet:master] 2 new commits

87a089c test/serverbrowser: delete pConsole - def- e7fafc5 Merge #4404 - bors[bot]

15:07

bors[bot]

[ddnet/ddnet] Pull request closed: #4404 test/serverbrowser: delete pConsole

def-

[ddnet/ddnet] Pull request opened: #4405 Try to use unique_ptr in tests so we can't forget to delete

Why is the PingCache test failing now???

Checklist

[ ] Tested the change ingame
[ ] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
[ ] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
[ ] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
[ ] Considered possible null pointers and out of bounds array indexing
[ ] Changed no physics that affect existing maps
[ ] Tested the change with [ASan+UBSan or valgrind's memcheck](https://githu...

How do they even come up with these silly questions? If you are using string_reverse what is the point of a loop even...

18:26

Beginner CS classes always boggle my mind

Learath2

How do they even come up with these silly questions? If you are using string_reverse what is the point of a loop even...

I had such question but as recursive function

you should do strong/weak hook warning backwards like, when you see someone who have strong on you-red above him and if you have strong on him-green above him and i dont like this weak/strong hook warnings because it distracts. you should better do a colourful nickname like red nickname on someone you have weak for and green nickname if you have strong on him also you should do a custom colour, of course...

19:26

@deen how do i pull this request? (edited)

create issue instead

i dont know how to use github

create account press create issue on ddnet issues page

ok

Smetanolub

[ddnet/ddnet] Issue opened: #4406 weak/strong hook warning is wrong

you should do strong/weak hook warning backwards like, when you see someone who have strong on you-red above him and if you have strong on him-green above him and i dont like this weak/strong hook warnings because it distracts. you should better do a colourful nickname like red nickname on someone you have weak for and green nickname if you have strong on him also you should do a custom colour, of course...

it works xd

19:28

@Anime.pdf ty

19:29

small cat here (edited)

so what you mean is no extra icon just color on name?

yes

20:28

and 1 nnuclear war pls

20:28

or at least 1 guy who can read

def-

[ddnet-web:master] 1 new commit

ec1a651 Update frontpage video - def-

lol, after blue death of screen my ingame config has been reset

(edited)

22:42

no backups no pity hrhr

chillerdragon

no backups no pity hrhr

i have backup, but so old

oh yikes

hm......... before blue screen game not was running

22:43

config drop earlier

i recommend git for configs :)

22:45

but did you lose all your data or only ddnet configs?

only config, screenshots and others intact (edited)

22:47

the last time I played - just closed the game through alt+f4

i do not know how this even can happen but i hear it way too often. Saying get backups after the fact is frustrating. Maybe ddnet should do auto backups.

i think itd be best to have option to choose either color or symbol signal for strong/weak cause i'm not sure that red/green as only indication is great for accessibility, and also some people may just prefer the symbols

23:11

i admit i say this as someone on an old version so maybe thats already the case

23:12

I do agree red should be those u have weak on and green should be those u have strong on

23:14

hmm, also, take my first "or" inclusive or, not exclusive or lol

symbol doesn't help since you want to know for all combinations of players who has strong on whom

def-

[ddnet/ddnet] Pull request opened: #4407 Lower chance of losing written files by syncing them to disk on close

I'm wondering if this helps. Overhead exists, but is not that much (on my system): 333 ms for initialization instead of 311 ms If we only want to do this for files written to, then we need to keep track of how the file was opened.

Checklist

[x] Tested the change ingame
[ ] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
[ ] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
[ ] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
[ ] Con...

deen

symbol doesn't help since you want to know for all combinations of players who has strong on whom

well how does that work with the colors then

23:39

I agree thats useful info but i feel the best way to convey that kind of ordering will always just be a number

it doesn't work with colors

23:43

numbers are fine, easy to tell apart