Development discussion. Logged to https://ddnet.tw/irclogs/ Connected with DDNet's IRC channel, Matrix room and GitHub repositories — IRC: #ddnet on Quakenet | Matrix: #ddnet-developer:matrix.org GitHub: https://github.com/ddnet
Between 2020-08-04 00:00:00Z and 2020-08-05 00:00:00Z
if that commit goes out on a release the only way to fix it would be to not send extended items to 0.7 clients which would be absolutely detrimental to performance
Both client and server have a table of snap sizes, so the actual size does not need to be included in the snapshot itself. This table just had a fixed size of 64
16:55
has*
16:57
Actually this table only contains items that were present in 0.7.0, otherwise old clients would fail to unpack the snapshot.
If the size is zero, the actual size of the snap item is included in the snapshot
I do not understand code from dwangoAC. "Coming from Python, I tried my luck at both Rust and Go except there was always something wrong with my code. I'm trying again in C. Is this better? Why is everyone angry?"