DDraceNetwork - developer

DDraceNetwork

Development / developer

Development discussion. Logged to https://ddnet.tw/irclogs/ Connected with DDNet's IRC channel, Matrix room and GitHub repositories — IRC: #ddnet on Quakenet | Matrix: #ddnet-developer:matrix.org GitHub: https://github.com/ddnet

Between 2020-03-05 00:00:00Z and 2020-03-06 00:00:00Z

[ddnet-maps:master] 1 new commit

ff2e1dd M SpookyDrag - ddnet-maps

@Learath2 i ported ddnet dummy to 0.7, but hammerfly is slow, takes about 1-2 sec to re-hammer, an idea why?

before starting or is every hammer late?

every

15:35

calculations are the same of course, dunno why that happens

is the rate correct?

wym

is it hammering at the correct rate?

you mean the interval?

yep

as said, there is like a 1-2 sec delay inbetween

15:41

its 1 sec

15:41

pretty exact afaict

15:42

nah, more like 1.25 (edited)

Hmm, idk how the dummy hammerfly works tbh, but it looks like it's supposed to be every 1.25s

that doesnt make sense

15:44

i guess you know how hammering works

15:45

its like every < 0.5 sec

does it hammer faster in ddnet6?

of course

15:45

like a normal hammerfly guy

this is why I hate magic constants in the code, who knows what that 12.5f is based on

yes

15:46

i just set it to 1.25 for testing, and now it hammers faster (too fast)

15:47

so no idea what else causes the hammer on 0.6 to be correct

SendInput happens on every snap, which calls OnSnapInput, which increments m_DummyFire and sends a fire input if it's not close to a multiple of 12.5

15:49

if it's close*

15:49

maybe we are calling SendInput more in ddnet?

can be

Are you sending input on both dummy and main tee snaps?

15:51

and on CClient::Update

15:52

actually on snap we only send it if there was an error

15:52

so I don't see how you could be calling it less

@Learath2 btw you fucked up the client commands i guess

16:32

in master i cannot use /w anymore

On ddnet7 or on teeworlds?

teeworlds client 0.7

@fokkonaut is it only /w?

dunno, guess all client commands

can't be all client commands atleast /all and the commands registered by the server work

it's just /w the argument list was wrong

ok

@fokkonaut hmm, how is /w supposed to work?

17:14

from the code it seems it should only change the whisper target

you write /w <name>, hit enter and then the whisper chat opens and you gotta write a message, hit enter again (COMPELTELY gay imho)

17:15

Btw, what do you recommend now for my dummy hammerfly problem?

17:15

just decrease the 1.25?

17:15

i mean its still weird

@fokkonaut it is very weird, maybe ask deen? I think he wrote the original code, he might have a better idea

17:17

@fokkonaut also, /w does seem to work just fine, are you sure it's broken?

17:17

I thought it was supposed to be able to send messages instantly that's why I thought it was broken, but it's not

you need to do it on a server that has the new stuff implemented, try out my server

new stuff? you are running my pr?

my sevrer is up to date

17:18

yes

your server has a 2mb map and we don't have http download

17:18

I'll start downloading and go have dinner

i increased the download speed.

17:18

should work in seconds

it takes 55 seconds

bad connection maybe? :P

even more actually

17:19

it's a 35mbit link, doubt it's the connection

i really wonder why hammer doesnt work, well it seems like it works as expected, since the delay is pretty exactly 1.25s, but then why doesnt it behave like that in dnet?

@fokkonaut it works just fine for me on your server aswell

latest client?

yep

ok well, dunno what was wrong, works now for me too

@fokkonaut u nobo thats what is wrong kek

kek

troll

u

@fokkonaut did you merge my commands pr in ddnet7?

dunno

21:17

dont htink so

21:18

you didnt pr, but you can push them directly to mastr

Ah, it needs the vanilla merge of arguments for it to work properly

21:18

we should find a way to get it to work with 0.7.4

21:18

maybe translating the argument lists to strip the things in []

i dont care about supporting old clients

well you'd only support master, it's not a good idea no one is using master

i would just not send the auto completion stuff to older clients, since they can have 22 cmds only

21:19

anyway

can't detect older clients can we?

22:16

we need a translator for the arglist anyway for the older clients

of course we can detect them, they send client version

22:31

No, we dont need to translate it if we dont send it. They can use the old chat system.

22:31

The chat system needs to stay anyway (for binds)

why does it need to stay?

22:50

why does it need to stay for binds?

whats the tile id for hookthru tile

Exported 89 message(s)