DDraceNetwork - developer

[quakenet] <Learath2> heinrich5991: I think the bridge is dead :(

or not?

[quakenet] <Learath2> it's dead in one way

06:22

[quakenet] <quinerr> Hi, I'm wondering where you get your https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/blob/master/data/fonts/Icons.ttf

ddnet/ddnet

ddnet - DDraceNetwork, a mod of Teeworlds

06:23

[quakenet] <quinerr> I tried https://packages.debian.org/sid/fonts/fonts-materialdesignicons-webfont but nak...

@Deleted User ^^

[quakenet] <Learath2> seems jupey added that one, im not sure

@Learath2 we already build on an ancient linux...

oh, and still it didn't work on his computer :/

06:24

even more ancient linux?

yeah, looks like his linux mint version has an even older c++ stdlib

06:25

I'm building on Debian 6 already, while Debian 8 is going out of support soon...

guess linking c++ stdlib statically shouldn't be much of an issue actually, it shouldn't be too big

and I saw they have a nice solution for glibc with the special headers

06:25

but didn't find the equivalent for stdlibc++

you can't really link glibc statically though, makes sense there is a solution

06:26

oh actually, I don't see why you can't, I've just never read about it

well, you shouldn't statically link glibc

06:27

but you could use musl instead

we could use that header solution for glibc and statically link libgcc and c++std

06:29

or actually we could have 3 builds like i've seen with some other products

06:31

that sounds like a stupid solution nvm, why hasn't this been solved already?

because Linux is not supposed to work like this

06:31

on Mac and Windows you get nice backwards-compatibility for commercial releases

06:31

on Linux your distribution is supposed to recompile all your binaries

06:32

but obviously that doesn't work if the distributions don't have the binary and your users are incapable of compiling it themselves

well how were they thinking of accommodating for cases where you don't have source?

not

eh, I guess things like flatpak kinda make sense to me now

[quakenet] <quinerr> hm any more?

what happened to the solution of simply linking to older glibc versions? @deen

10:01

.

the problem here is libstdc++, not glibc

I've nothing to do with that Debian package

[quakenet] <quinerr> but you should at least mention the source of the font

License

11:07

Google icon font

[quakenet] <quinerr> your font point didn't match the unicode standard

11:13

[quakenet] <quinerr> while google's one does

11:16

[quakenet] <quinerr> more precisely, it uses private area

then it seems they fucked up in that release idk

[freenode] <nemo> heinrich5991: ohhh was wondering

@heinrich5991

13:04

@jao

13:04

https://gyazo.com/68c532c0552e2b2126eef04a3d6606e5

Gyazo

13:04

how2make that border

[highlightbox=#hexcode][/highlightbox] (edited)

thx

Insane 6* btw lol

that's extreme 1*

Impossible -7*

No-release *4

lol

def-

[ddnet-web:master] 1 new commit

c69bcf8 Add donation - def-

damn

18:48

new reddit design

18:48

https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/8lje2s/admins_getting_feedback_on_the_new_reddit_redesign/ xD

r/funny - Admins getting feedback on the new Reddit Redesign

47507 votes and 1953 so far on reddit

we sharing reddit on dev channel now?

18:56

https://www.reddit.com/r/Unexpected/comments/8liez1/the_royal_wedding/?utm_source=reddit-android

r/Unexpected - The Royal wedding..

23398 votes and 268 so far on reddit